Everything You Need To Know About 9/11 In A 5 Minute Video

Good question. Nobody points out that everyone is a conspiracy theorist when it comes to 9/11. For example, the government tells us it was a conspiracy of Islamic terrorists. So the term “conspiracy theorist” about 9/11 applies to everyone.

There are 3 schools of thought: 1) the official explanation, that Islamic terrorists were responsible for 9/11 and they did it because they hate our way of life (or similar motives); 2) Islamic terrorists were responsible, but they did it because we provoked them by invading their countries and other interventionist policies (the “blow back” theory), and 3) 9/11 was an attempt by a rogue element in the US government to overthrow it.

Most people won’t even look at the claims of those who question the official explanation. Many openly ridicule people who even ask questions about the official story.

I’m willing to hear anybody who says they have evidence about anything, no matter how far-out it seems to me. To refuse to do that is to be afraid of what you might find out. I think that’s the problem most people have. They can’t get past the idea that the government could possibly do such a horrible thing.

Do you remember the supposed attack in the Gulf of Tonkin that was the reason we got heavily involved in Vietnam? Google it. And also “Operation Northwoods.”

Then let me know if you can figure out why World Trade Center Building 7 came down, and why it came down the way it did.

Then let’s talk.

P. S. I sent the video above to a friend who is a reporter for a major Washington, DC daily newspaper — to protect his job, I won’t mention his name nor his paper, although you can guess. The Chic Burlingame he mentions was the pilot of the plane that reportedly crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 — which, given the near-impossible trajectory for even the best pilot, much less an inexperienced and hardly-trained supposed terrorist pilot, the lack of airplane debris at the site, the presence of wheel parts that match a Global Hawk drone, the admission by the Navy that one Global Hawk out of the half dozen inventory is unaccounted for, the immediate confiscation of all video of the crash by the government, and for other reasons, I don’t think could possibly have been a plane and was likely a Global Hawk.

Here is his response to the video:

Bill,

Funny you should send this. I have been in touch with Field McConnell, a former Top Gun Navy pilot who was roommates with Chic Burlingame at Annapolis, and forensic economist David Hawkins, a Canadian, who came to the same conclusion that 9 1 1 was a false flag operation conducted by rogue elements in Canada and the US government.

Their website, which is visited by a lot of military and intel folks, is http://www.captainsherlock.com.

They are convinced that this was an attempted coup d’etat which almost succeeded, except for the fact that the fourth plane headed for the US Capitol experienced a still-unexplained delay, allowing members of Congress and the Bush administration to escape. However, they name many prominent Republicans as well as Democrats as co-conspirators in a civil suit that they filed in ND, which has never been served.

McConnell told me personally that he has talked to members of the ND National Guard who were involved in a “war game” with Canadian forces that day (“Amalgam Virgo”) and were intentionally diverted away from DC. when the “game” turned into a real attack, explaining why no fighter jets were scrambled to stop the third “plane” from hitting the Pentagon. They also reported that the head of FEMA was up in the air before the attack began.

He also says as an experienced navigator with 28 years of flying experience, he could tell immediately that the aircraft that hit the WTC buildings were drones, not the real passenger aircraft, which they surmise were diverted over the Atlantic and ditched. There also has not been any adequate explanation for why WTC7 collapsed straight down in seconds even though it was never hit. (If they haven’t taken it down, you can see the video on the National Institute of Standards and Technology website (www.nist.gov). That was what finally convinced me that the official explanation was a bunch of BS.

The whole thing was filmed by a staged film crew that was supposedly doing a documentary on the NYFD, but McConnell and Hawkins say were really making the “first mass snuff film in history.”

I wrote snippets about this in the past, but was reprimanded by my boss and forced to delete it when I tried to post a blog entry describing newly released ABC aerial footage of the WTC towers that showed a pyroclastic cloud similar to a volcano. No way could that much damage have been caused by two airplanes, no matter how much fuel they were carrying. Architects for Truth also points out that burning jet fuel could not melt the steel structure of the buildings
because it was not at a high enough temperature.